Vincent Horn

If you've been following my lifestream lately, you'll see that I've become pretty obsessed with tea. A good friend of mine, earlier this year, invited me over to try "real tea." At the time, I asked how real tea was different from the loose leaf tea I'd have at a coffeeshop or the tea bags I got from the store? He kind of scoffed, as any tea snob would, and said, "You mean McTea?" Well, it turns out he was right. After having tea with him a few times, I was hooked. I bought several tea items--including the cups, gaiwan, and bamboo tea table you see ...

Last week I officially launched the first Micropatronage Drive for Buddhist Geeks. A micropatron is someone who supports Buddhist Geeks financially, in a small way, but with enough micropatrons we can really garner the financial support we need to take Buddhist Geeks to another level. The other level we’re planning has to do with launching two new projects, both of which have been percolating for a while. The first is a full-fledged digital magazine and the other is an in-person conference entitled BuddhaDharma 2.0. And the cool thing is, if we’re able to get the support we need, we’ll then make all of the digital content ...

The folks at the OneCity Blog on BeliefNet were kind enough to accept an article that I'd recently finished up on the potential downsides to making Buddhism completely secular. It's entitled, Secularizing Buddhism: Making it Accessible or Stripping the Roots? Here's a little snippet from the article: The problem with not seeing how Buddhism has evolved, and in not seeing ourselves as a part of Buddhism's evolution, is that we can believe we are somehow the holders of the "essence" of Buddhism. But what is the essence stripped from the practices, realizations, models, and people who have contributed to this living tradition? Is there really such a thing? ...

A nice fellow named Joel responded to my comment yesterday, and I decided to write another big chunk of material to try and clarify some of my current thinking around "enlightenment". Here's Joel's original comment, followed by my response: I appreciate Vince Horn’s comments regarding the need to demystify enlightenment. I’d like to make a minor point here. While I think it is true that we often project ‘weird shit’ onto those we regard as enlightened teachers–a longtime Buddhist practitioner once said to me, with a straight face, ‘Tibetans aren’t like us. They can fly’–I do believe the saying, ‘Ye shall know them by their fruits’ carries some validity. Among The ...

These questions, with my responses following, were recently posed on the Tricycle blog: How do we know what enlightenment is precisely if no one we know has reached it? Who is qualified to serve as judge to gauge whether someone is, in fact, enlightened when clearly those left to label someone as such are most likely not, themselves, enlightened? If it’s also true that one who claims to be enlightened is most certainly not so, how does one know when someone becomes enlightened? Stephen Bodian explores this with Adyashanti in “The Taboo of Enlightenment” in the Fall 2004 issue of Tricycle. Would love to hear what folks think about this. Interesting ...

I find that somehow, by shifting the focus of attention, I become the very thing I look at and experience the kind of consciousness it has; I become the inner witness of the thing. I call this capacity of entering other focal points of consciousness – love. – Sri Nisargadatta MaharajI heard that quote from Nisargadatta, the famous advaita sage, on a recent month-long retreat. I found it significant, because at the time I was working with the enquiry question, “What is Love?” and had started to come to the same realization. So, when I heard the very simple description of love that Nisargadatta gave, of ...